TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

2005 (10) TMI 450 - AT - Central Excise

  1. 2011 (7) TMI 1048 - AT
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the modification application based on the case of Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd. v. UOI. The Tribunal waived further pre-deposit requirement and ordered the listing of the appeal for regular hearing as the assessee was finding it difficult to meet the full deposit order due to loss of business.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Job worker can sell scrap directly under Section 143(5) CGST Act throu...
H: Kerala SGST Updates Delegation for Waiver Applications Under Section 1...
H: Kerala GST Department implements Section 74A procedural changes for st...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 363 mirrors existing tribunal powers with ...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 362 modernizes appellate process maintaini...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 361(2) creates dual appointment system for...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 introduces Clause 361 reforming tribunal constitu...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 360 maintains appellate powers identical t...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 359 mirrors 1961 Act appeal procedures but...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 358 retains appeal procedures from Section...
A: Committee of Creditors holds commercial wisdom to approve resolution p...
A: Electronic Credit Ledger with negative balance cannot be blocked under...
A: India's GST dual taxation model faces federal tensions over Council au...
A: Tax officer must use multiple service methods under Section 169 when t...
A: GST completes eight years with Rs 20 trillion revenue but faces credit...
A: Section 74 CGST notice invalid without fraud allegations after Section...
H: GST demand order quashed for exceeding show-cause notice amount under ...
H: Petitioner's installment request must be considered within three weeks...
H: Detenue held in illegal custody beyond 24-hour limit violating Article...
H: Bail granted to accused in CGST evasion case upheld after chargesheet ...
H: GST appeal delay can be condoned under Section 5 of Limitation Act whe...
H: Arbitration award set aside for exceeding mandatory three-month timeli...
H: Service on Chartered Accountant insufficient for Section 260A appeals;...
H: ITAT quashes assessment proceedings under section 153C due to jurisdic...
H: ITAT allows short-term capital loss on share sale, rules oral family a...
H: Indexation benefit for LTCG computation starts from letter of intent d...
H: Settlement Commission immunity limited to customs matters, cannot prot...
H: Xiaomi's challenge to FEMA Rule 4(3) opinion formation rejected, unaut...
H: Money laundering accused cannot seek blanket arrest protection without...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 357 Modernizes Appeals Framework Expanding...