Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2006 (3) TMI 581 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Duty demand on items supplied to "Simhadri Vizag Transmission Systems" project based on exemption notification and clarification from Central Board of Excise & Customs.
In this case, the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, heard the matter regarding duty demand on items supplied to the "Simhadri Vizag Transmission Systems" project. The project was financed by the Japanese Bank of International Cooperation, and initially, the goods were cleared without payment of duty based on a certificate issued under exemption notification No. 108/95. However, a clarification from the Central Board of Excise & Customs stated that the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation was not recognized as an international organization under the United Nations (Privileges and Immunities) Act, 1947. The appellant argued that the duty demand was unjustified, highlighting that the original clearance was based on a certificate from the Competent State Government authority. They claimed eligibility for duty-free clearance or reimbursement as the supplies were treated as deemed exports. The appellant emphasized that exemption provisions should be interpreted in line with the intended purpose. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's submission. The supplies were made duty-free based on a letter from the State Government administering the project, and they had the status of deemed exports. It was undisputed that the project was funded by a Foreign Development Bank. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the requirement for pre-deposit and stayed the recovery until the appeal's disposal. The judgment was dictated and pronounced in open court by Member (T) C.N.B. Nair.
|