Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2006 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (5) TMI 334 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......t of the Respondents has certified that the amount claimed by way of depreciation has not been returned back. Therefore, there is no ground for holding that the respondents have passed on the duty burden to their customers. We, accordingly see no ground to interfere with the impugned order, uphold the same and reject the appeal. (Dictated in Court)
|