2005 (10) TMI 489 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the Respondent, setting aside the demand on compounded rubber due to lack of evidence of marketability. The Revenue failed to prove that compounded rubber in lump form is a marketable commodity, leading to the rejection of their appeal. (2005 (10) TMI 489 - CESTAT, Mumbai)