Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (1) TMI 428 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......e said rule that maximum amount of penalty was indicated therein. So, the contention of the Revenue that Rule 173Q suggests minimum limit of penalty is incorrect. So, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. (Dictated and pronounced in open court).
|