Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2007 (10) TMI 498 - AT - Central Excise
Issues involved: Appeal against admissibility of Cenvat credit on certain items used for installation of batch vessel.
Summary: 1. The Revenue appealed against the order-in-appeal regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on specific iron and steel items used for installation purposes. The Commissioner (Appeals) deemed these items essential for the plant and machinery, allowing the Modvat credits. The Revenue argued that these items were used for constructing the base to install machines, making Cenvat credit inadmissible. Reference was made to a Tribunal decision highlighting the distinction between material handling and construction activities. 2. The respondent's Counsel contended that the items were indeed used for installing the batch vessel, forming an essential part of the plant and machinery. Citing a Tribunal decision and a High Court ruling, it was argued that similar items were eligible for Cenvat credit when used for repair and maintenance of machinery in a workshop. 3. Upon hearing both sides and reviewing the records, it was established that the items in question were utilized for installing the batch vessel, integral to the machine. The Tribunal and High Court decisions supported the eligibility of such items for Modvat credit, emphasizing the importance of proper maintenance for the smooth functioning of plant and machinery. The judgment concluded that denying Cenvat credit for items essential to the base of the machine would hinder its proper functioning, thus upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order and dismissing the Revenue's appeal. 4. The judgment highlighted the significance of these items in ensuring the smooth operation of the plant and machinery, ultimately affirming the decision to allow Cenvat credit for the items used in the base of the machine.
|