Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued soon

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2006 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password

 

2006 (11) TMI 539 - AT - Customs

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad directed the appellant company to deposit Rs. 1,17,289 within four weeks, with no financial hardship claimed. The company had already furnished a Bank Guarantee for the amount, which would be released upon deposit. The company was instructed to approach Customs Authorities after making the deposit.

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 457 maintains 2% penalty for transfer pric...
H: Rajasthan Housing Board Exempt from Income Tax Under Section 10(46A)(b...
H: DGFT Notifies New SIONs A-3687, A-3688, A-3689 for Chemical Exports Un...
H: Customs Chennai ends Service Centres by June 2025; all document submis...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 456 imposes five lakh rupee penalty on inv...
F: Foreign supplier testing services abroad for Indian recipient not subj...
N: Bihar amends GST refund and appeal procedures under Rule 164 effective...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 455 imposes 50,000 penalties for inaccurat...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 454 maintains Rs. 500-1,000 daily penaltie...
T: Section 188 loan repayment violations face penalties equal to amount r...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 452 imposes 5000 rupee daily penalty for n...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 451 introduces penalties equal to transact...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 450 imposes penalties equal to loan amount...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 448 introduces penalties for TDS non-compl...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 449 gives discretionary penalty powers to ...
A: Company wins refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit worth INR 4.37 cror...
A: Customs exemption benefits under Advance Authorization Scheme cannot b...
A: GST Act Section 17 restricts input tax credit for mixed-use goods and ...
A: SB0005 shipping bill errors block IGST refund claims for 2020 exports ...
A: Housing Board cannot demand additional GST after advertising flat pric...
A: SB0004 shipping bill errors block IGST export refunds due to Customs E...
A: Taxpayer's email reply to show cause notice must be considered in GST ...
H: Penalty upheld as due process followed; mens rea not needed under rele...
H: Assessment order under Sec 143(3) and 144B quashed for denying fair no...
H: Reassessment under Section 148 denied as all material facts, including...
H: Gratuity and Leave Encashment Expenses Allowed Only as Actual Payments...
H: Payment under Income Declaration Scheme 2016 deemed timely despite int...
H: ITAT Upholds Rs. 1.60 Cr Income Addition from Survey, Deletes Unsecure...
H: Penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271B require independent proof,...
H: Notice under Section 148 issued after assessee's death is invalid; reo...