Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (7) TMI 778 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......nd it was shown as expenses. Therefore, in my view, the Appellant failed to prove that the incidence of duty has not been passed on to any other person. Accordingly, I do not find any reason to interfere the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal filed by the Appellant is rejected. (Order dictated and pronounced in open court on 16-7-2008)
|