Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (10) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......ior to 1-9-94 which was not refuted by the Revenue. Therefore, demand of duty prior to 1-4-2000, was rightly set aside by Commissioner (Appeals). 7. emsp In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in the Revenue rsquo s appeal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected. (Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court)
|