Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT, AHMEDABADExtract: .......d that there is suppression. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), who has correctly held that there was no suppression and therefore, the extended period for payment of the demand was not available to the Revenue. Accordingly, the appeals filed by Revenue are rejected. (Pronounced in Court)
|