TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2008 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

 

2008 (12) TMI 539 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 33/2005-C.E. due to lack of jurisdiction by the Commissioner (Appeals) who passed the impugned order. The case was remanded to the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals). (2008 (12) TMI 539 - CESTAT, BANGALORE)

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
T: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal structure unchanged in new Bill despite ...
F: Company faces reverse charge mechanism liability on rent paid to unreg...
F: Client providing vehicles to goods transportation agency on fixed kilo...
F: Logistics company's door-to-door services with foreign exchange paymen...
A: Excel printout from pen drive inadmissible as evidence without mandato...
A: Vehicle rental income to Goods Transport Agencies exempt from GST unde...
A: GST collections hit record Rs 22.08 lakh crore in 2024-25 with 9.4% gr...
A: Section 128A closure procedures allow taxpayers to apply for interest/...
A: Company liable for advance tax until amalgamation scheme receives form...
A: Lithium-ion batteries for mobile phones qualify as telephone parts und...
A: Bank wrongly served GST recovery notice under Section 79(1)(c) without...
H: Writ Petition Dismissed on ITC Ineligibility; Natural Justice Followed...
H: Job work on metallic film rolls not classified as textiles; GST rate f...
H: Garlic peeled, chopped, and packed classified under HSN 07032000; no G...
H: No GST Exemption for Student Transportation and Catering Services Unde...
H: Assessee's Revenue Recognition Under AS-9 Upheld, AO's PCM Application...
H: Development authority recognized as charitable under Section 11 and Se...
H: Date of Agreement, Not Possession, Determines LTCG Acquisition Date Un...
H: Section 40A(9) Expenses Allowed; Section 32AC Investment Allowance Den...
H: AO can conduct full scrutiny beyond initial reasons; development charg...
H: Additions based on uncertified WhatsApp messages under Section 69B qua...
H: Refund Claim for Anti-Dumping Duty Held Timely Under Section 27; Denia...
H: Tribunal rules demand unsustainable as authorities exceeded SCN scope;...
H: Extended limitation period not applicable without proof of willful sup...
H: CESTAT Rules Marketing Services to Foreign Parent as Export, Not Inter...
H: Extended Excise Duty Demand Quashed for Time-Bar; Retained VAT Exclude...
F: GST payments under protest allowed despite no explicit statutory provi...
F: IT service exporters under LUT don't need signatures on electronic GST...
F: Taxpayer challenges proportionate refund formula after Net ITC computa...
T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 363 mirrors existing tribunal powers with ...