Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (1) TMI 608 - CESTAT, AHMEDABADExtract: .......er of the Tribunal does not arise. It has not been denied that when the order was passed by the Tribunal, penalty stood imposed under Rule 25 only and no corrigendum had been issued and even subsequently also no corrigendum has been issued. Since there is no error apparent from the records, the application for ROM is rejected. (Pronounced in court)
|