Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1959 (9) TMI 31 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues:
- Assessment of sales tax on estimated turnover - Inclusion of sales made directly by the corporation in the turnover - Petitioners' failure to produce accounts before Sales Tax Authorities Analysis: The petitioners, as sole selling agents of a corporation, challenged the assessment of sales tax on their estimated turnover, alleging that the amount from direct sales by the corporation to customers was wrongly included. The petitioners contended that they were acting as brokers, and no sale was made by them for taxation under the Bihar Sales Tax Act. However, the court dismissed the application on two grounds. Firstly, the petitioners failed to utilize the statutory remedies provided under the Act, such as approaching the Board of Revenue for a reference to the High Court. The court cited a previous case to emphasize that bypassing statutory remedies to seek relief under Article 226 of the Constitution is impermissible. The court also noted that the petitioners did not raise the argument regarding the nature of sales before the Sales Tax Authorities, as they never produced accounts or returns. The court highlighted that the question of different types of sales was a matter of accounting, which was not presented before the lower tax authorities. Therefore, the court concluded that the petitioners failed to establish a case for the grant of a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution. Consequently, the application was dismissed, with costs imposed on the petitioners.
|