Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment deals with the interpretation of provisions u/s 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in relation to allowing deductions for export turnover and the treatment of losses from export business. Interpretation of Section 80HHC: The case involved a dispute regarding the allowance of relief u/s 80HHC of the Income-tax Act in a situation where there was a loss from export business. The Assessing Officer initially allowed the deduction under section 80HHC, but the revising authority later withdrew this relief. The Tribunal, however, chose to grant the relief, leading to the question of whether this decision was justified. Legal Precedents and Interpretations: The judgment referenced various legal precedents to analyze the interpretation of section 80HHC. The Kerala High Court in CIT v. A.V. Thomas and Co. Ltd. [1997] 225 ITR 29 held that the deduction under section 80HHC is linked to export turnover rather than income, thus allowing the deduction even in cases of losses from export business. However, in CIT v. V.T. Joseph [1997] 225 ITR 731, the Kerala High Court restricted the deduction under section 80HHC to the extent of income from export business included in the gross total income. Supreme Court Decision and Conclusion: The Bombay High Court in IPCA Laboratories Ltd. v. Deputy CIT (No. 1) [2001] 251 ITR 401 held that the disclaimer under section 80HHC(1) applies only to profits and excludes losses. The Supreme Court, in IPCA Laboratory Ltd. v. Deputy CIT [2004] 266 ITR 521, disapproved the Bombay High Court's decision and overruled the Kerala High Court's judgment, affirming that relief under section 80HHC is available only in the absence of losses from export business. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding that relief under section 80HHC is not applicable in cases of losses from export business. Conclusion: In conclusion, the High Court accepted the appeal, answered the questions of law in favor of the Revenue, and ordered accordingly without any costs.
|