Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
High Court: MADRAS High Court
Citation: 1998 (3) TMI 12 - MADRAS High Court Judges: N. V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, P. THANGAVEL Judgment Summary: The question of law referred for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78 was whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the disallowance of expenditure incurred on Agmark coupons, fumigation charges, carriage of export goods, marine insurance, and certificate of origin under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1978-79. The court held that expenses on Agmark cannot be considered as incurred for promoting export sales or for submitting technical information to foreign buyers, thus not qualifying for weighted deduction under section 35B. This view aligns with the Andhra Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Navabharat Enterprises (P.) Ltd. (No. 2) [1988] 170 ITR 332. For fumigation charges, carriage of export goods, marine insurance, and certificate of origin, the court held these expenses fall under section 35B(1)(b)(iii) as they are for the carriage of goods in India, and thus, not eligible for weighted deduction under section 35B. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the question of law was answered in the affirmative and against the assessee. No order as to costs was made.
|