Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
The petitioner challenged an order under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act, requiring accounts audit despite previous audit under section 44AB. The court upheld the order, stating that the audits under the two sections serve different purposes. The court also rejected the argument based on section 142(2B) and allowed the petitioner to make a representation against the order.
|