Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1979 (11) TMI 225 - SC - Indian Laws
Whether section 81(3) of the Central Act or any portion of it was merely directory?
Whether the signatures in original found on the copies were intended to authenticate the documents to which they were appended and that in the circumstances of that case, the absence of the words "true copy" above the signature of the election petitioner in the copies was not fatal?
Held that:- Appeal dismissed. The requirement that every copy of the election petition which is intended for service on the respondent should be attested by the petitioner under his own signature is a mandatory requirement and the non-compliance with that requirement should result in the dismissal of the petition as provided in section 94 of the Act. The High Court was, therefore, right in dismissing the petition on the above ground