9911796707
Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Follow us:
|
Home
The High Court of Madras upheld the Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax's decision that the petitioner was not eligible for compounding benefits for the assessment year 1984-85 due to holding over 100 acres. The court ruled that the maximum extent of land held during the financial year is relevant for determining eligibility for compounding. The judgment was delivered by Judge R. Jayasimha Babu, and the revision petition was dismissed. (Case citation: 1997 (9) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court)
|
