Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1999 (2) TMI 625 - SC - CustomsChallenging the conviction under Section 135(1)(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 and Section 85(1)(ii) of the Gold (Control) Act 1968 - Held that - The interest of justice will be fully met if instead of directing the appellants to go to jail for serving the balance sentence we direct that each of them should pay fine of Rs.1 lakh (Rupees one lakh) within four months from today failing which they will have to undergo the substantive sentence as directed in the impugned judgment.
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants for possession of gold biscuits but reduced their sentence to a fine of Rs. 1 lakh each. The appellants were found with 600 gold biscuits in 1969 and argued for a reduced sentence due to changed import policies and personal circumstances. The Court considered mitigating factors and previous judgments before deciding on the fine. The appeals and writ petitions were disposed of accordingly. (Case citation: 1999 (2) TMI 625 - Supreme Court)
|