Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1991 (6) TMI 243 - AT - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues Involved:
1. Demand of interest on turnover tax for late payment. 2. Validity of the interim and final orders of the High Court concerning interest liability. 3. Compliance with statutory requirements for filing returns. 4. Applicability of sections 10A of the 1941 Act and 8A of the 1954 Act. Detailed Analysis: 1. Demand of Interest on Turnover Tax for Late Payment: The applicant-company challenged the demand for interest on turnover tax for late payment under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. The company argued that it had paid the turnover tax as per the High Court's order and thus should not be liable for interest. The Tribunal noted that the primary condition for the applicability of interest provisions under sections 10A of the 1941 Act and 8A of the 1954 Act is the non-payment of the full amount of payable tax within the prescribed date. The Tribunal concluded that interest accrues according to the statute if the tax is not paid within the prescribed time. 2. Validity of the Interim and Final Orders of the High Court Concerning Interest Liability: The applicant contended that the interim order of the High Court protected it from paying interest on the delayed turnover tax. The respondents argued that the interim order did not prevent the applicant from paying the tax or the accrual of interest. The Tribunal held that the interim order did not stop the running of time for payment of interest, and the final order merely facilitated payment in installments without addressing the interest liability. Therefore, neither the interim nor the final order nullified the statutory provisions for the accrual of interest. 3. Compliance with Statutory Requirements for Filing Returns: The applicant claimed that it had filed returns in accordance with the principles laid down by the Tribunal in previous cases, disclosing all relevant particulars relating to turnover tax and the reason for non-payment. The respondents countered that the returns were not always correct or complete, as they were not accompanied by treasury challans showing payment of the entire amount of the turnover tax. The Tribunal observed that the statutory requirements are not met merely by filing returns; the returns must be accompanied by receipted treasury challans. Thus, the applicant's returns were not fully compliant, leading to the accrual of interest. 4. Applicability of Sections 10A of the 1941 Act and 8A of the 1954 Act: The Tribunal examined the applicability of sections 10A of the 1941 Act and 8A of the 1954 Act, which are pari materia, to the applicant's case. The Tribunal differentiated between two classes of returns filed by the applicant: those where the reason for non-payment of tax was stated and those where it was not. For returns where the reason was stated, sub-section (1) applied, while for those where it was not stated, sub-section (2) applied. The Tribunal concluded that the statutory provisions for interest applied to the applicant's case, and the interest liability accrued as per the statute. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the application, upholding the demand for interest on the delayed payment of turnover tax. The interim and final orders of the High Court did not exempt the applicant from interest liability. The statutory requirements for filing returns were not fully met by the applicant, leading to the accrual of interest under sections 10A of the 1941 Act and 8A of the 1954 Act. The application was dismissed, and any interim order was vacated.
|