Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
The appellants claimed refund for double payment of duty due to double invoicing by the supplier. The Customs had granted re-credit of Rs. 2,78,593.68 to their import license but rejected the refund claim as time-barred. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that duty charged on non-existent goods should be treated as a deposit, not duty, and directed a fresh consideration of the claim by the Appellate Collector. (Case: Appellate Tribunal CEGAT CALCUTTA, Citation: 1983 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT CALCUTTA)
|