Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
The petitioner sought to quash a notice issued by the Income-tax Officer under section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner claimed no connection with the business concern mentioned in the notice, while the respondent argued that the petitioner was a partner in a partnership firm liable to pay tax. The court found disputed facts and dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to seek remedy elsewhere. No costs were awarded, and any security deposit would be refunded.
|