Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1978 (2) TMI 209 - SUPREME COURT
Extract:
.......titioners. ORDER We agree with the conclusion of Brother Bhagwati but prefer to rest our decision on the ground that the impugned Act violates the provisions of Article 31(2) and is, therefore, void. We consider it unnecessary to express any opinion on the effect of the judgment of the Calcutta High Court in W.P. No. 371 of 1976. Petitions allowed.
