Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2014 (5) TMI 1044 - SCH - Service TaxIf the appellant had discharged its full duty and interest liability that itself showed its bonafide or not. - Simultaneous penalties under both Sections 76 and 78 - The benefit of this Amendment in Section 78 by the Finance Act 2008 - Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the ground of delay filed by the Revenue against the decision of Delhi High Court 2011 (8) TMI 423 - DELHI HIGH COURT wherein high court held that there is bonafide error on the part of Appellant. Therefore there is not question of penalty.
Case: Supreme Court Citation: 2014 (5) TMI 1044 - SC Order
Judges: Anil R. Dave and Shiva Kirti Singh, JJ. Decision: Special Leave Petitions dismissed due to delay.
|