Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (8) TMI 884 - SCH - Central ExciseDemand - Limitation - The only issue in this case is whether the appellant could have invoked the extended period of limitation as mentioned in the proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act 1944? - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. Versus WONDERAX LABORATORIES IPL. 2007 (10) TMI 388 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested where it was held that assessee acted bonafide in making its clearance and claiming exemption even using other s brand name. extended period of limitation not invocable - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - appeal dismissed.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2008 (8) TMI 884 - SC. Justices S.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy delivered the order.
|