Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2011 (11) TMI 627 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax
Issues involved: Petitioner seeking writ to quash reassessment order, declare sales eligible for incentive u/s 8(5) of CST Act, mandamus for tax exemption without form C, challenge applicability of notification dated May 31, 2002.
Quashing of reassessment order: Petitioner, a company under Companies Act and dealer u/s KST Act, sought to challenge reassessment order directing payment of tax due to non-production of form C for tax exemption u/s 8(5) of CST Act. Court found assessing authority's decision justified as petitioner failed to fulfill conditions for benefit under section 8(5) of CST Act, leading to dismissal of writ petitions. Interpretation of section 8(5) of CST Act: Referring to a previous judgment, the court clarified that section 8(5) of CST Act is prospective and not an absolute right, requiring fulfillment of specified conditions for availing benefits. Emphasized that non-production of form C by petitioner rendered them ineligible for tax exemption, supporting the reassessing authority's decision to reverse the order of assessment. Conclusion: After hearing arguments and reviewing the case, the court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the reassessing authority's decision to hold the petitioner liable for tax payment due to non-compliance with the conditions of section 8(5) of CST Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of fulfilling statutory requirements for claiming tax benefits under the relevant provisions.
|