Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues: Challenge to legality and validity of order imposing penalty under Customs Act, 1962 by CESTAT.
Analysis: The appellant challenged the order dated 9th of July 2009, passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), confirming the penalty of &8377; 2,50,000 imposed by the Commissioner of Customs under Order-in-Original No. 16/2005. The case involved unclaimed and undervalued precious stones imported from M/s. Kalyan Gems Trading Co. The Commissioner of Customs issued show cause notices to the appellant and others, leading to the penalty imposition. The CESTAT, after considering the appeals, set aside penalties on two appellants but confirmed the penalty on the present appellant, Ashok Kumar Khandelwal. The appellant argued insufficient opportunity of hearing and unjustified penalty imposition based on statements of others. However, the CESTAT found the appellant liable under the Customs Act, considering the evidence and nexus between the appellant and the impugned import consignment. The CESTAT's reasoned order, despite the absence of the appellant's counsel during final proceedings, was deemed legal and proper. The appellant failed to raise any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.
|