Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp

9911796707

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued soon

Follow us:

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + SCH Central Excise - 1994 (8) TMI SCH This

Login
Referred In
Summary

Forgot password

New Registrations:
Now Available at TaxTMI.Com

1994 (8) TMI 299 - SCH - Central Excise

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding whether Unipro Lamp Components is a 'related person' under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, based on the decision in Union of India v. Hind Lamps Ltd. No costs were awarded. (Citation: 1994 (8) TMI 299 - SC Order)

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

F: Service tax review order challenged for exceeding three-month limitati...

H: Customs Launches Trade Facilitation Centre to Streamline Queries and G...

F: Exporter entitled to both IGST refund and inverted tax refund under Se...

F: Taxpayer defends multiple e-way bills on same invoice citing no revenu...

F: Rajasthan company must register in Himachal Pradesh under Section 10(1...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 496 grants Special Courts exclusive jurisd...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 495 creates Special Courts for tax offense...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 494 criminalizes unauthorized taxpayer inf...

C: IBBI withdraws Form IP-1 for insolvency professional assignments, repl...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 493 allows tax authority records as eviden...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 492 makes specific tax offences non-cogniz...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 491 expands prosecution sanction authoriti...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 490 shifts burden to accused proving no cu...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 489 creates rebuttable presumptions for as...

T: Clause 488 Income Tax Bill 2025 maintains karta liability for HUF tax ...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 487 creates corporate tax liability for di...

T: Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 486 narrows reasonable cause defense compa...

A: GST taxpayers must maintain updated contact details as email service c...

A: Section 263 allows senior tax officials to revise erroneous orders pre...

A: Central Government notifies GST Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules 202...

A: Clerical error in tax invoice listing "copra" instead of "dry grapes" ...

A: Transfer of actionable claims under Property Act 1882 excludes GST whe...

A: Excess GST refund limitation period starts from conciliation settlemen...

H: Central Act 2005 Overrides State Act 1975, Affirming Daughters' Coparc...

H: Failure to allow cross-examination under CGST Act violates natural jus...

H: Petition Dismissed for Bypassing Mandatory Pre-Deposit Requirement Und...

H: Reopening Assessment Needs Only "Information Suggesting" Income Escape...

H: AO exceeded scrutiny limits on demonetization cash deposits without PC...

H: Section 2(22)(e) Deemed Dividend Rules Not Applicable on Loans from Si...

H: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Additions Under Section 68 for Share Capital,...