Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2006 (11) TMI 635 - AT - Central Excise
Issues involved: Applicability of Service Tax on maintenance and repair services provided by a PSU, interpretation of Board Circular regarding Service Tax liability, applicability of previous Tribunal judgment on similar issue.
Issue 1: Applicability of Service Tax on maintenance and repair services The appellant, a PSU, provided maintenance and repair services to customers based on quotations. Notification No. 7/2003 brought maintenance and repairs under the ambit of Service Tax. The appellant claimed that they did not have a maintenance contract before 16-6-2005, and therefore, Service Tax should not be levied for the relevant period. Issue 2: Interpretation of Board Circular and Tribunal Judgment The appellant relied on a Tribunal judgment in the case of Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., which was affirmed by the Apex Court, to support their claim for waiver of Service Tax. The appellant argued that the Board Circular and Tribunal ruling should result in a waiver of over &8377; 18 crores in Service Tax confirmed in the impugned order. Issue 3: Applicability of previous Tribunal judgment The JDR opposed the appellant's claim, stating that the previous Tribunal judgment pertained to different activities and that the Commissioner had provided detailed findings on the matter. The JDR prayed for the appellants to be put on terms. In the judgment, the Tribunal noted that the appellant being a Government of India undertaking, the Board's circular had applicability to the case. The Tribunal observed that units run by the Government of India are treated differently in terms of deposit requirements, considering the transfer of amounts between departments. After considering the arguments presented by the appellants, the Tribunal granted a full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the amount exceeding &8377; 18 crores until the appeal's disposal. The Tribunal scheduled the matter for final hearing on 19th January 2007.
|