Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (9) TMI 950 - SCH - Income TaxAddition u/s 68 - Cash Credit - Unexplained share application money - assessee has not been able to give satisfactory explanation in respect of certain expenditure or where any sum is found credited in the books of accounts the AO can treat the same as undisclosed income and add to the income of the assessee.
The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition after condoning the delay. The citation is 2012 (9) TMI 950 - SC. The High Court reference is 2011 (12) TMI 394 - Delhi High Court. The presiding judge was Mr. Justice A.K. Patnaik. Petitioner's counsel included Mr. Rakesh Khanna, ASG, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Ms. Padmalakshmi Nigam, and Ms. Anil Katiyar.
|