Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues:
Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing the assessee's appeal against the Commissioner of Income-tax's order under section 263 regarding depreciation rate for a cold storage plant. Analysis: The Commissioner of Income-tax set aside the assessment orders and directed a fresh assessment, reducing the depreciation rate from 30% to 15%. The assessee appealed to the Tribunal, which upheld the Assessing Officer's view. The Tribunal considered a certificate from a chartered engineer stating the cold storage as a renewable energy device. This certificate led to the Tribunal's decision to allow depreciation at 30%, as per the Income-tax Rules. The Tribunal's decision was based on factual evidence and not arbitrary. Conclusion: The High Court, concurring with the Tribunal's findings, answered the question in favor of the claimant, stating that the cold storage qualified as a renewable energy device. The Court directed the opinion to be transmitted to the Tribunal without costs. Judge Barin Ghosh agreed with the decision.
|