Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues involved: Cross appeals by Revenue and Assessee against order of CIT(A)-Central-I, Kolkata for A.Yr. 2005-06.
Revenue's Grounds (ITA No.141/Kol/2012): - Benefit of Peak credit allowed without explanation on fund recycling. - Discrepancy in peak credit calculation by CIT(A) and AO. - Request for altering grounds. Assessee's Grounds (ITA No.27/Kol/2012): - Challenge to CIT(A)'s order. - Consolidated peak credit should be considered. - Request for adding or amending grounds. Facts: - Cash seized led to scrutiny assessment. - Six bank accounts investigated post seizure. - Assessee claimed cash from clients for investments. - AO treated total deposits in bank accounts as undisclosed income. - CIT(A) directed treating peak credit of bank accounts as undisclosed income. - Tribunal set aside orders for lack of investigation into debit side. Tribunal's Decision: - Neither AO nor CIT(A) followed Tribunal's direction. - Proper method is to consolidate all bank accounts for peak credit determination. - Orders set aside for recalculating peak credit of consolidated bank accounts. - Appeal of Revenue and Assessee allowed for statistical purposes. Judgment Date: 09.05.2012.
|