Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (8) TMI 755 - SCH - Central ExciseWhether the printing on the package is merely incidental or primary? Held that - keeping in view the conflict of opinion on the point involved the matter is placed for hearing before a Larger Bench.
The Supreme Court ordered a batch of appeals to be heard by a Larger Bench due to conflicting opinions on whether printing on a package is incidental or primary. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for appropriate orders. (Case Citation: 2007 (8) TMI 755 - SC)
|