Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against CIT(A) order regarding deduction u/s 80 IC for manufacturing activity of anchor rods.
Issue 1: Deduction u/s 80 IC for threading and painting of anchor rods The Revenue contended that the threading and painting of anchor rods by the assessee did not amount to manufacturing, thus challenging the allowance of deduction u/s 80 IC. The Tribunal found that the issue was previously addressed in the assessee's own case and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision based on the Tribunal's earlier ruling. Issue 2: Manufacturing of anchor rods by third parties on job work basis The Revenue argued that manufacturing of anchor rods by third parties on job work basis should not be considered for deduction u/s 80 IC. However, the Tribunal referred to previous rulings in the assessee's case for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, where similar claims were allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction u/s 80 IC based on consistency with earlier orders. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s order allowing the deduction u/s 80 IC for the manufacturing activity of anchor rods.
|