Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the civil revision petition as the notice under rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, had been served on the defaulter, who was not allowed to deal with his property without permission from the Tax Recovery Officer under rule 16. The court found no grounds for interference and dismissed the petition with no costs. (Case Citation: 1995 (10) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court; Judge: V. K. JHANJI)
|