Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (5) TMI 1293 - HC - CustomsImposition of ADD - imports of melamine - imported from People s Republic of China - alternative remedy provided under the Customs Tariff Act 1975 of an appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal - Held that - The Court does not find the above plea to constitute a sufficient justification to permit the Petitioner to bypass the statutory remedy of an appeal provided under the Customs Tariff Act 1975. It would be open to the Petitioner to request the CESTAT as and when an appeal is filed to dispose it expeditiously - petition dismissed.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an anti-dumping duty notification on imports of melamine from China, stating that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appeal process before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) instead of bypassing it. The petition was dismissed with this observation.
|