Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (10) TMI 1090 - HC - Central ExcisePenalty - Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules 1944 - Held that - The penalty levied under Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules 1944 cannot survive once the Rule itself has been struck down by the Hon ble Supreme Court of India. It is conceded therefore that the Revenue s appeal would have to be dismissed - decided against Revenue.
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeal as the penalty levied under Rule 96ZQ(5)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 cannot stand after being struck down by the Supreme Court of India in the case of M/s. Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. The Commissioner of Central Excise (2015).
|