Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues involved: Quantum appeals for two different assesses, penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act for the same assessment years.
Judgment Details: 1. Quantum Appeal - Gomti Silk Mills Ltd. (ITA No.2898/Ahd/2006 for A.Y.2003-2004): - Ground Nos. 1 and 2 challenged the addition of specific amounts. - Assessee argued discrepancies in the P&L account and stock details. - Tribunal found that the addition cannot exceed the debited amount in the P&L account. - Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh decision. - Grounds 1 and 2 allowed for statistical purpose. 2. Quantum Appeal - Gomti Fibres Ltd. (ITA No.2899/Ahd/2006): - Grounds challenged additions and interest charges. - Assessee pointed out discrepancies in the consumption of raw material and stock details. - Tribunal observed that the addition was not justified as the material was not consumed in the present year. - Order set aside and matter remanded to the AO for fresh decision. - Appeal allowed for statistical purpose. 3. Penalty Appeals: - Since additions were set aside in quantum appeals, penalties were also deleted. - AO can initiate penalty proceedings again if new additions are made. - Both penalty appeals allowed. In conclusion, both quantum appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and penalty appeals were also allowed as penalties were deleted due to the set-aside additions.
|