Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (1) TMI 1436 - AT - Central ExciseValuation - determination of assessable value - Instead of providing the entire cost data the respondents provided only overhead expenses of the second half of the year stating that to be Rs. 75.02 per kg. while the actual factory overhead was Rs. 106.20 per kg. - Held that - we are not able to understand from the facts of the present case as to whether the officer conducting his adjudication has applied his mind in good faith to law. If he fails to discharge his duty under law having his own scope to call for entire details it is very difficult to appreciate the Revenue s case after twelve years - appeal dismissed - decided against revenue.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed Revenue's appeal due to misdeclaration causing prejudice in determining assessable value. The officer's failure to apply his mind in good faith was highlighted, referencing the Nizam Sugar Factory case.
|