Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues involved: Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05.
For Assessment Year 2003-04: The assessee, a partnership firm, filed its return declaring 'NIL' income after claiming deduction u/s.80IB(10). The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction in the assessment u/s.143(3) r.w.s.153A, leading to penalty proceedings u/s.271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the assessment was final and no incriminating material was found during the search. The High Court's decision supported the assessee's argument. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as the assessment had attained finality before the search, and the disallowances were not based on any new findings. For Assessment Year 2004-05: The grounds raised were identical to the previous year. The Tribunal, following the same reasoning, allowed the appeal and cancelled the penalty. In conclusion, both appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and the penalties u/s.271(1)(c) for both assessment years were cancelled.
|