Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment deals with the disallowance of contribution made to a group gratuity scheme of LIC of India, being an unapproved fund u/s 40A(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Details of the Judgment: Issue 1: Disallowance of contribution to unapproved gratuity fund u/s 40A(7) of the IT Act The AO disallowed the claim of payment of &8377; 26,53,000/- to LIC under section 40A (7) as the application for recognition of the group gratuity scheme was pending for approval. The CIT(A) allowed the appeal based on the decision of ITAT Ahmedabad Bench in the case of Crystal Solvent Pvt. Ltd., stating that disallowance u/s 40A(7) cannot be made due to the absence of approval of the gratuity fund as the deduction was not claimed on account of any provision. Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 40A(7) of the IT Act The Tribunal analyzed Section 40A(7) which disallows deduction for any provision made by the assessee for gratuity payment. It was noted that the assessee claimed deduction for actual expenses incurred under gratuity contribution, not just a provision. Citing precedents like CIT vs Gujarat Machine Tools and CIT vs Bitoni Lamps Ltd., it was held that actual payment of funds to LIC, not mere provision, is not hit by section 40A(7). Conclusion: After considering the submissions and legal provisions, the Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition. The departmental appeal was dismissed, affirming that the contribution towards gratuity made to LIC was allowable as a deduction under the circumstances presented. Note: Separate judgment was not delivered by the judges mentioned in the case.
|