Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
1973 (3) TMI 138 - HC - Companies Law
The appellant's trademark was removed from the register due to non-payment of fees for renewal. The Registrar may restore the mark to the register if it is just to do so. The Registrar dismissed the appellant's restoration petition without proper consideration. Restoration should not be denied if it is just, without penal considerations. Restoration may be denied if a third party would be prejudiced, but in this case, restoration is allowed. The appeal is allowed with no costs.
|