Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2017 (3) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (3) TMI 1588 - HC - CustomsPrayer to appear before the authority concerned for recording the statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act in the presence of his counsel - Section 104 of the Customs Act - power to summon a person - Held that: - From the perusal of the provisions contained under Section 108 of the Customs Act it is evident that the authorities concerned have power to summon a person for giving evidence and produce the documents and in view of Section 108(3) all persons so summoned shall be bound to attend either in person or by an authorized agent, as such officer may direct; and all persons so summoned shall be bound to state the truth upon any subject, respecting which they are examined or make statements and produce such documents and other things as may be required - So far as the power to arrest any person against whom the cognizable offence is made out after recording the statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act then he shall be arrested by the Customs Authorities in view of Section 104(1) of the Act if evasion or attempted evasion of duty exceeding fifty lakh rupees. The said offence is non-bailable offence as is clear from Section 104(6)(d) of Customs Act. There is no statutory provision which may allow a person to appear along with his counsel before the authorities concerned while his statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act is to be recorded - For achieving the object of such an enquiry if the appropriate authorities be of the view that such persons should be dissociated from the atmosphere and the company of persons who provide encouragement to them in adopting a non-cooperative attitude to the machineries of law, there cannot be any legitimate objection in depriving them of such company. The relevant provisions of the Constitution in this regard have to be construed in the spirit they were made and the benefits thereunder should not be “expanded” to favour exploiters engaged in tax evasion at the cost of public exchequer. The presence of counsel refusal during interrogation/recording the statement of a person under the Customs Act would not be violative of Articles 20(3) and 21 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed - decided against petitioner.
|