Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2011 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (5) TMI 49 - CESTAT, AHMEDABADDifferential duty - there is a direction to the appellant to pay the differential amount in terms of finally assessed Bill of Entry and the provisionally assessed Bill of Entry - By no stretch of imagination, the said letter can be read to be as an appealable order so as to require the appellant to file an appeal their-against. It is only subsequent letter dt.16.12.05 indicating that the bills of entry assessed on 7.2.05 were supplied to the appellant - The minimum obligation on the part of the Revenue was that to supply a copy of the said Bill of Entry to the appellant, so as to enable them to challenge the same before higher appellate forum - It may be noted that even in the said letter, there is no indication that the assessed Bill of Entry were earlier supplied to the appellant and they are being given for the second time - Appeal is disposed off by way of remand
|