Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT, CHENNAIBrand name - The documents collected and statements recorded during the investigation clearly shows that the party has suppressed the brand name used by assessee in their products and cleared the goods in the guise of Hybro brand - As per the decision of the Hon ble High Court in the case of CCE, Raigad Vs. Ramply (I) Ltd. (2009 -TMI - 76074 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY), non-declaration of the use of others brand name despite having knowledge about the same, amounts to suppression - Hence appeal is allowed by way of remand in favour of Revenue.
|