Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (7) TMI 591 - AT - Service TaxRefund - claimant was not registered with the department during the period the impugned credit accrued to it - As the claimant was not registered with the department the impugned refund is not apparently admissible to the respondents - The stay application is rejected
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application for stay of operation of the impugned order by the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding three refund claims totaling Rs. 3,37,109/- under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The claimant was not registered with the department during the period the credit accrued, making the refund inadmissible. The original authority did not raise this issue in the show cause notice, so the impugned order stands. The stay application was rejected.
|