9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (12) TMI 835 - AT - Income TaxDeduction u/s. 10A - Incomes of unexplained nature - High Profit - held that - - No doubt high profitability may give rise to suspicion but suspicion alone is not sufficient to come to conclusions and have to be backed by some evidence - Hence the AO was not justified in treating the some of Rs.12440567/- as incomes of unexplained nature - The AO is directed to treat the said receipt as sale proceeds of computer software and allow deduction u/s 10A - Decided in favour of assessee. Commission payment - the submissions of the assessee that the commission payment made to Tracy Loui as she rendered services to earn such commission. In order to increase turnover the assessee has to explore new areas make new customers and acquire day to day knowledge of the market and for that reasons Tracy Loui was employed - Find that the said payment was made through RBI and necessary deductions on account of tax payable were duly made - In absence of any evidence brought on record on behalf of the revenue authorities to the contrary the expenses incurred by the assessee towards commission payment is allowed in full - Thus the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Issues Involved:
1. Claim of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. 2. Disallowance of commission payment to Tracy Louie. Detailed Analysis: 1. Claim of Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act: The assessee company, engaged in the export of computer software, claimed a deduction under Section 10A amounting to Rs. 93,25,871/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this claim on several grounds: - Nature of Export: The AO argued that the assessee did not export programs on any physical storage device but rather exported data/services over the internet. The AO contended that such services were not notified by the Board as eligible for deduction under Section 10A. - Export Turnover: The AO found that only Rs. 1,06,02,955/- was received in convertible foreign exchange within the relevant financial year or within six months after its expiry. The AO limited the deduction to this amount, excluding Rs. 39,35,734/- received before the company's recognition as a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU). - High Profitability: The AO questioned the high profit margin of 69.7% and the low expenses incurred, suggesting that the assessee was not equipped to render the services claimed. - Close Connection: The AO suggested a close connection between the assessee and the overseas concern, implying a collusive arrangement. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] reversed the AO's decision, stating that: - The definition of "computer software" under Section 10A includes various IT services, and the assessee's services fall within this definition. - The assessee provided evidence of export and receipt of payments within the stipulated period. - The entire export turnover for the year should be considered for deduction, irrespective of the date of recognition as an EOU. - High profitability alone does not justify disallowance without concrete evidence of wrongdoing. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the AO's conclusions were based on suppositions rather than evidence. The tribunal found no need to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order, thereby allowing the deduction under Section 10A. 2. Disallowance of Commission Payment to Tracy Louie: The AO disallowed the commission payment of Rs. 16,91,140/- to Tracy Louie, arguing that the assessee did not utilize any liaison work for its business during the relevant year. The AO claimed that the payment was not justified as an expense laid out in the business's interest. The CIT(A) disagreed, noting that: - The commission was paid for branding, marketing, consulting, and liaison work. - The payment was made after deduction of tax and with RBI's permission. - The assessee provided evidence that Tracy Louie's groundwork yielded results in subsequent years. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), finding that the payment was made for legitimate business purposes and was duly documented. The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, allowing the commission payment as a deductible expense. Conclusion: The tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The assessee was entitled to the deduction under Section 10A, and the commission payment to Tracy Louie was allowed as a business expense.
|
