Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (2) TMI 813 - AT - Service TaxService tax demand penalty and interest on the ground that the appellant has been rendering Franchisee service of selling abacus system of arithmetic calculation - Held that - issue is squarely settled in favour of the assessee in the case of Fast Arithmetic(2009 - TMI - 34931 - CESTAT BANGLORE) application for waiver of pre-deposit of the amounts involved is allowed
Issues:
1. Waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties. 2. Applicability of service tax on Franchisee service of selling 'abacus' system. 3. Interpretation of 'Commercial Training or Coaching' services. Analysis: The judgment pertains to a stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties amounting to Rs. 30,20,604, imposed on the appellant for rendering Franchisee service of selling 'abacus' system of arithmetic calculation. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand based on the nature of the service provided. The appellant relied on a previous case, Fast Arithmetic v. Asstt. CCE, where a similar issue was settled in favor of the assessee. The appellant argued that the activity falls under a recreational program rather than 'Commercial Training or Coaching' services, as contended by the authorities. Upon careful consideration of the submissions, the Tribunal observed that the lower authorities sought to levy service tax on the activity of teaching mathematics through the 'abacus' training program under the category of 'Commercial Training or Coaching' services. However, the Tribunal found that the decision in the case of Fast Arithmetic prima facie favored the assessee's position. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant had established a prima facie case for the waiver of pre-deposit. As a result, the application for the waiver of pre-deposit of the amounts involved was allowed, and the recovery of the said amounts was stayed pending the disposal of the appeal.
|