9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
Interpretation of cash credit in the books of the assessee as income from tea business u/s 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1974-75. Judgment Summary: Issue 1: Nature of Cash Credit in Assessee's Books The Income-tax Officer discovered a current account named "Kayah" in the assessee's tea garden books, showing a credit balance of Rs. 51,717.67. The assessee claimed the amount represented short-term loans from M/s. Hukumchand Santalal but failed to prove the source. The Income-tax Officer treated the unexplained cash credit of Rs. 1,28,369 as income from undisclosed sources. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directed the Income-tax Officer to treat the cash credits as secret income from the tea business. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that the cash credits were part of the assessee's business books and continued throughout the accounting period. Issue 2: Legal Precedents and Tribunal Decision The Tribunal referenced a similar case (CIT v. Hasimara Industries Ltd.) where the cash credit account was considered part of the business books and treated as business income. Citing the decision in Daulatram Rawatmull v. CIT [1967] 64 ITR 593, the Tribunal affirmed that in such circumstances, undisclosed income under section 68 of the Act should be treated as business income. The High Court concurred with this view, holding in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the treatment of the cash credit as income from the tea business for the assessment year 1974-75. No costs were awarded in this matter.
|
