Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
The High Court of Madras, in a tax case reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, ruled that the subsidy received from SIPCOT did not reduce the actual cost of plant and machinery for depreciation and development rebate. The court cited a recent decision in Srinivas Industries v. CIT [1991] 188 ITR 22 and ruled in favor of the taxpayer. No costs were awarded.
|